Are you overloaded with client-side and server-side rendering knowledge right now? It’s understandable, considering how much information is out there on the matter. The good news is, you’re in the right place!

This blog post is a comprehensive guide to understanding the difference between client-side and server-side rendering. We’ll break down why you need it, the benefits of each approach, when to use them, and what tradeoffs to consider. All without overwhelming you with technical jargon.

Let’s jump in and start understanding why browser-side and server-side rendering are essential for web developers.

Quick Explanation of Key Points

Client-side rendering involves generating HTML, CSS and JavaScript code on the browser itself in order to render a page. Server-side rendering involves using a back-end language such as PHP or Node.js to generate HTML, CSS and JavaScript at the server level for delivery to the browser.

What is Client-Side Rendering?

Client-side rendering is the process of generating HTML output to be sent to a user’s web browser using JavaScript which is executed in the browser itself. This is the most common approach for web page rendering, and it’s used on all modern browsers. In client-side rendering, the browser retrieves an HTML file from a server; then the HTML, stylesheets and scripts are parsed by the browser and together form a document object model (DOM). The DOM is initialised when all the content (images, videos, web pages) has been loaded before being sent to the client via their web browser.

Advocates of client-side rendering argue it allows for dynamic updating of webpages in response to user interactions, such as loading more content or searching. Client-side rendering can also provide better user experience as loading times are significantly faster compared to those encountered with server-side rendering since the user directly interacts with the application interface instead of waiting for data to travel through HTTP requests.

On the other hand, proponents of server-side rendering suggest that relying too heavily on client-side scripting could result in slow performance and security risks since users can view text resources they’re not supposed to have access.

Overall, client-side rendering provides faster loading times and more flexibility as it requires fewer infrastructure investments and allows for higher customization on single page applications but comes with greater security risks. In contrast, server-side rendering offers additional security features but tends to be slower than its counterpart.

The next section will explore what exactly is Server-Side Rendering and discuss its advantages and disadvantages in further detail.

  • Server-side rendering typically results in greater efficiency since it can return data more quickly than client-side rendering.
  • Client-side rendering is more flexible and allows for dynamic content, but inherently takes longer for a page to load.
  • According to a study conducted in 2020, there are performance gains from using server-side rendering that can be seen on mobile devices and low-end computers compared to client-side rendering.

What is Server-Side Rendering?

Server-side rendering (SSR) is a type of web application rendering that occurs on the server side rather than being done in the browser. It involves sending prepared HTML to the client, providing a much faster response time than traditional client-side rendering. This type of rendering allows search engine bots to crawl websites and content more quickly, increasing indexability and improving SEO rankings.

The main benefit of server-side rendering is its speed and performance. Because HTML is sent directly to the user, they don’t have to wait for JavaScript to first load or be parsed. This eliminates long loading times which can make all the difference in user engagement levels and sales conversions. Additionally, server-side rendering can improve interactions with crawlers since it provides all the information at once and not incrementally as it would with client-side rendering. The biggest and most attractive advantage of SSR is its ability to enable fast navigation from page to page, whereas client-side makes each navigation experience slower due to code recompilation.

Despite the advantages of SSR however, there are some disadvantages that should be considered. One potential disadvantage is having to handle larger payloads due to extra data being sent back from the server to the client. Server-side rendering also forces developers to move all their interactive tasks away from the client, resulting in more coding and longer development times. Additionally, managing state becomes much harder when server-side rendering as state must passed from the server down into the template. Lastly, certain libraries can prove difficult or even prohibitively expensive when developing with SSR since they are built for an asynchronous style of programming that isn’t typically part of a server-side setup.

Overall, there are various pros and cons that need to be weighed when considering whether or not to use server-side rendering for an application project, but its speed advantage makes it a popular choice among developers who prioritise performance over flexibility and cost effectiveness. With this in mind, let’s take a look now at how exactly this type of rendering works within web applications.

Leading Into Next Section:

Now that we understand what server-side rendering is, let’s delve deeper into how this type of render works within web applications by looking at how it works in more detail.

How Does Server-Side Rendering Work?

Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is a process of generating HTML code on the web server and sending it to the web browser. It is an effective way to display large amounts of data quickly and efficiently. The SSR process involves executing the required JavaScript code on the server to render the page’s components before they are sent to the browser. This can help reduce latency on pages with numerous elements, allowing them to load faster despite their size.

When using SSR, developers can make use of a number of client-side technologies including AJAX, CDNs, and service worker caches for improved performance and optimised user experience. Additionally, caching rendered pages on a server can avoid pulling fresh content from a database or third-party service every time a request is made.

The distinction between client-side rendering (CSR) and SSR has caused debate among developers about which is more efficient and effective for rendering web pages. Proponents of CSR argue that it allows browsers to run more efficiently because it does not require an additional network request to render the HTML from the server-side. Conversely, proponents of SSR argue that it ensures faster loading times and allows all necessary data to be included in the initial page load. Ultimately, each strategy has its own merits and drawbacks, so developers must carefully consider which approach is best suited for their particular project.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at some of the differences between Client-Side Rendering (CSR) and Server-Side Rendering (SSR).

Differences Between Client-Side and Server-Side Rendering

The key difference between client-side and server-side rendering lies in the location of where the HTML markup for a given page is created. In the case of client-side rendering, the browser creates the HTML after it receives and executes the JavaScript code sent from the server. In the case of Server-Side Rendering, however, the server is responsible for creating the HTML markup before sending it to the browser.

In general, client-side rendering has become more popular as browsers continue to optimise their support for running JavaScript code quickly. With this approach, developers can build complex user interfaces that respond dynamically – meaning they can change depending on user interaction – by using only client-side scripting.

Server-Side Rendering (SSR), on the other hand, is still a viable option when faster page load times need to be achieved because all the processing to generate HTML is done prior to sending it over to users’ devices. SSR is especially useful if you have an application with a large amount of content that needs to be delivered quickly and consistently over slow connexions or devices with minimal computing power (e.g., tablets). Above all, SSR allows creators to provide a pre-rendered version of their website much quicker than client-side rendering can do so.

Additionally, SSR offers more robust security measures compared to CSR because only content that passes rigorous validation checks is sent over for display making it harder for malicious scripts to embed hidden pieces of code on your website. Additionally, since SSR does not require external libraries such as NodeJS or V8 engine (in case of Chrome) which can be slower and prone to compatibility issues with certain browsers, it further improves server performance to some extent as well.

However, server-side rendering does come with its own set of shortcomings as it may introduce increased latency due to extra round trips between server and browser besides having a few caching and security limitations as well.

To summarise: client-side rendering allows developers to create dynamic pages with up-to-date information while server-side rendering provides quicker loading times but less flexibility when building complex user interfaces and experiences.

As we move further into this article, let’s examine how these different approaches affect performance in order to determine which one would work best for your web application in our next section, “Performance Impact”.

Performance Impact

When it comes to performance, client-side and server-side rendering can have very different impacts. Many developers consider client-side rendering to be faster because the page is created on the user’s device, meaning it doesn’t need to travel from a server. However, there are downsides to this approach. Client-side rendering requires more bandwidth as the page resources must be downloaded before the page is rendered. Additionally, client-side rendering has limitations in terms of scalability due to the reliance on the user’s computer for processing power.

Server-side rendering, on the other hand, can often prove more efficient for many web projects. By delivering a pre-rendered version of a site that does not require extensive JavaScript code execution, server-side rendering can maximise performance and speed up delivery times. Server-side rendering also provides more control over caching which can further improve performance and help deliver faster loading times.

However, server-side rendering isn’t perfect either. It requires more processing power from the server, meaning sites with high traffic may not run as efficiently as those with lower levels of users. Additionally, while there are some text compression methods available they are not as effective as those found on client-side solutions.

Overall, both approaches have tradeoffs when it comes to performance and it will come down to what works best for your unique needs and setup. In any case, taking measures such as optimising images and using gzip compression can help improve performance no matter the method you choose.

As we’ve discussed how each approach differs in terms of performance impact, let’s turn our attention to the next factor when comparing client-side and server-side rendering: user experience impact.

User Experience Impact

User experience is a key factor in how a website is perceived by its visitors, and understanding the differences between client-side and server-side rendering can have a large impact on that experience. Client-side rendering offers a smooth and seamless page experience for the user since it allows for faster page loading speeds since all of the HTML is loaded at once. Since the browser only downloads needed assets, the pages can be agile and responsive to the user’s input; this makes client-side rendering ideal for applications with interactive elements or multiple frontend components.

Conversely, server-side rendering can add to initial loading time because all of the content needs to be generated from the server before it can be presented on the page. It also does not allow for as much steeper user interaction as client-side rendering does; however, making customizations using server-side render can garner quick results rather than relying on complicated coding changes. Additionally, server-side renders are more secure since they shield certain data points from view until further authorisation requirements such as entering a password.

Choosing which type of rendering approach to implement depends largely on how the site will be used. If the user experience is a priority, then an application should take advantage of client side rendered paradigms so that users have a seamless website experience with fast loading speeds. On the other hand, if security and rapid updates are desired then server side rendering would be the better option. Both types of renderings come with pros and cons so it’s important to evaluate what works best for specific web applications.

By fully understanding the differences between each kind of render, developers can build applications that maximise performance while also delivering an exceptional user experience. Now that we know how different types of renderings affect user experience, let’s take a look at how they impact web applications in our next section: “The Impact of Client-Side and Server-Side Rendering on Web Applications”.

The Impact of Client-Side and Server-Side Rendering on Web Applications

The use of client-side and server-side rendering in web applications has a significant impact on the overall performance, design, and user experience. On one side, client-side rendering offers improved navigation speed, scalability, and customizability due to its asynchronous loading of scripts. This allows developers to create highly dynamic, interactive webpages with ease. On the other hand, server-side rendering allows for loading pages much more quickly as data is already pre-rendered on the server ready to be displayed on the browser.

In terms of performance, client-side rendering requests more resources for each page view as it requires both the browser and the server to process the same information. Also, because there is complexity associated with sending data from the server to the client’s browser, there can be delays in loading time which may have negative effects on user engagement. Server-side rendering eliminates such potential delays and reduces data exposure because only one request is being made instead of two.

In terms of design, while client-side rendering provides flexibility in UI implementation enabling developers to easily create rich websites (because scripts are loaded separately), this also increases page size increases making initial page load times slower than that of server-side renderings. Additionally, developers must write advanced code in order to enable single page application capabilities when using client-side renderings. With server-side renderings, however, most content can be cached resulting in better performance and faster navigation speeds.

The user experience is also very different depending on which type of rendering is used. Client-side rending enables dynamic changes to occur in real time without being redirected away from the current page allowing for seamless downloading of content; however, this can lead to slow response times if too many loops and JavaScript checks are required for a given action (such as adding an item to a cart). Server-side rendering provides faster page loads but may affect user interfacing as additional requests must be made before changes take effect due to data not initially being included in HTML responses.

This section has discussed how both client-and server-side renderings affect web applications: from performance and design considerations to user experiences. Despite their differences and individual benefits/pitfalls, both forms offer advantages/disadvantages relative to their usage scenarios – causing a tradeoff between scalability or usability features – that bring tremendous value when used properly. In the next section we will summarise these benefits/drawbacks so that you may decide which type of rendering is best suited for your website structure and goals.

Summarising the Benefits and Drawbacks of Client-Side and Server-Side Rendering

When deciding between client-side and server-side rendering for a web application, it is important to understand the benefits and drawbacks of both.

The main advantage of client-side rendering is enhanced user experience. Client-side code is processed in the browser, requiring fewer round trips to the server. This results in faster page load times and smoother navigation for users. Additionally, client-side rendering enables more interactive elements on the page, such as animations and hover effects, further improving the user experience. Furthermore, client-side rendering allows for better SEO optimisation since search engine crawlers are able to access content more efficiently.

However, there are certain drawbacks to using client-side rendering that must be taken into account. Client-side code relies heavily on JavaScript, which can be resource intensive and can slow down page performance if not optimised properly. Additionally, there are potential security risks when relying on client-side code since malicious scripts can be run in the browser without being detected by the server.

Server-side rendering avoids some of these issues since all requests are handled by the server before they reach the browser. Server-side code is typically less resource intensive than client-side code and can provide faster page loads due to fewer round trips to the server. Server-side code also allows developers to keep sensitive information behind the firewall, offering a higher level of security compared to client-side rendering.

Despite its advantages, server-side rendering has certain drawbacks worth considering. It requires more processing power from the server which can lead to higher costs for hosting fees over time. Additionally, it can result in poor performance when dealing with numerous requests from multiple browsers at once. Finally, server-side code does not present as many opportunities for improved user interface design due to its stateless nature; that is, each rendered page reverts back to its original state after each request.

When choosing between client-side and server-side rendering for a web application, it is important to understand both options’ benefits and drawbacks in order to make an informed decision that best suits an organisation’s needs and goals. Although both have their pros and cons, each technique has its own strengths depending on the application’s requirements.

Responses to Common Questions with Explanations

What advantages does server-side rendering provide over client-side rendering?

Server-side rendering provides a number of advantages over client-side rendering. First, server-side rendering allows for faster page load times as the content is pre-rendered and served directly from the server. This can be especially useful for SEO purposes to help increase page ranking. Additionally, server-side rendering offers better security as the code is not exposed to potential malicious actors that may be looking to exploit vulnerabilities in client-side code. It also offers better performance for users as there is less data that needs to be downloaded from the server onto the client’s machine. Finally, server-side rendering makes it easier to maintain complex websites as developers can update content on the server instead of manually making updates on each client device.

What are the benefits and disadvantages of client-side rendering?

The benefits of client-side rendering are primarily related to the user experience. By loading all of the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript on the client’s device, this allows for faster page loads and a more responsive experience since the page does not need to first be retrieved from the server. Furthermore, client-side rendered pages can take advantage of full interactivity for users. For example, when an action is performed, only the updated portion of the page will actually load instead of reloading the entire page. Additionally, certain types of applications can significantly benefit from client-side rendering and may actually require it in order to function properly.

On the other hand, disadvantages associated with client-side rendering come down to bandwidth usage and security risks. Client-side rendered applications tend to use more bandwidth as they require larger files to be loaded on the client’s end in order to work properly and also requires each user to download all of the necessary files on their browsers. In addition, one major disadvantage associated with client-side rendered application is that it can potentially open up opportunities for malicious users or hackers to exploit your application since all of your code will be available on each user’s device. Thus, it is important that you consider these factors when deciding whether client-side rendering is appropriate for your application.

Is it possible to use both client-side and server-side rendering in the same application?

Yes, it is possible to use both client-side and server-side rendering in the same application. Doing so offers several advantages, such as improved performance, responsiveness, flexibility, scalability, reusability and a better user experience.

Client-side rendering allows for a more responsive user interface as it reduces the load on the server. It also means that the initial page load times are faster, as the data does not need to be retrieved from a server each time a page loads. Additionally, errors can be more quickly dealt with using client-side code.

Server-side rendering ensures that the HTML content is fully loaded before the browser can begin to render the page, meaning that fewer resources are required to render the UI correctly. This also provides an advantage in terms of SEO since algorithms used by search engines require pages to have HTML content when they crawl them. Furthermore, if data is sensitive and needs to be kept off of client machines, server-side rendering can provide an additional layer of security.

Combining both approaches is often beneficial for a website or application as it can provide more balance between performance and security. As long as proper coding and testing has been done, combining client-side and server-side rendering can optimise loading times and make applications more efficient while keeping them secure.

Last Updated on March 21, 2023

Matt Jackson

E-commerce SEO expert, with over 10 years of full-time experience analyzing and fixing online shopping websites. Hands-on experience with Shopify, WordPress, Opencart, Magento, and other CMS.
Need SEO help? Email me for more info, at